You do not need to be a certified public accountant to understand that managing an annual tax return is a complex endeavor. Conversely, you certainly do not need to be a criminal to discover one fine day that the Tax Authority has unilaterally decided that you owe hundreds of thousands of shekels—despite being entirely confident that you managed your books lawfully and paid every single shekel due.
A income tax assessment (formally known as an “assessment according to the best of judgment”) is essentially the state’s way of saying to you: “Thank you very much for submitting your annual tax return, but we prefer our own version of your profits.” What do you do at this dramatic juncture? The answer is simple: you fight back. However, you must do so strategically and with the correct legal instruments.
Defining the Mechanism: What Is an Assessment According to the Best of Judgment?
A tax assessment is an independent calculation performed by the Assessing Officer following an audit of accounts or an in-depth examination of the business. The Authority issues such an assessment (referred to as a Stage A Assessment) when it refuses to accept the self-assessment return filed by the taxpayer (an individual or a corporation), distrusts the presented data, identifies discrepancies, or possesses intelligence and external information that contradicts the reporting.
In other words, a discrepancy arises—at times an absolute chasm—between the tax liability you declare and the tax the Income Tax department demands you pay. The primary challenge in tax law is the reversal of the burden of proof; the moment an assessment is issued, the state dictates the narrative, and you are forced to scramble and prove your innocence.
At a Critical Decision Point: The Objection Stage Under Section 150 of the Ordinance
It is vital to understand that a Stage A Assessment is by no means the final word. From the moment the assessment is served upon you, the window of opportunity for action is brief and rigid: you have exactly 30 days to file a written objection.
An objection is a complex legal document in every respect, through which you challenge the findings of the Assessing Officer, substantiate your position, and explain why the decree should be rescinded or the calculation altered fundamentally. If you choose to ignore it or miss the deadline, the assessment becomes final and conclusive, carrying the binding force of a final court judgment. Under such circumstances, reopening the file becomes an almost impossible task.
A Winning Strategy: How to Draft and Submit a Sophisticated Objection
-
In-Depth Analysis of Failures and Assessment Components: In the first phase, the findings of the Assessing Officer must be deconstructed into individual components. Did he rely on a factual error? Is it a distorted legal interpretation of statutory provisions? Or perhaps an incorrect and unfair comparison to other businesses within your specific sector? Every element requires a localized response—generalized assertions such as “this is exaggerated” will not hold weight.
-
Gathering and Presenting Conclusive Evidence: Invoices, signed contracts, business correspondence, bank statements, and economic analyses—these are your instruments of defense. An assessment based largely on conjectures, flimsy evaluations, or “best of judgment” calculations can be overturned relatively easily by presenting factual and concrete data.
-
Rigorous Legal Drafting (Pleadings Framework): An objection is not a letter requesting a favor or an application to an exceptions committee. It must be structured precisely like legal pleadings, incorporating exact references to the sections of the Income Tax Ordinance, current judicial precedent, and the accounting data of the case file.
-
Proposing Strategic Alternatives: Occasionally, within the framework of prudent risk management, it is advisable to present a nuanced defense line that offers an alternative resolution to the exposed discrepancy, or clarifies that the matter involves an isolated, one-time occurrence rather than a systemic failure in the business. Such a step is taken solely out of a broad strategic vision and never out of panic.
What Happens the Day After Submitting the Objection?
Upon submission of the document, the file advances to “Stage B,” and its handling is typically transferred to a different or more senior tax inspector:
-
Examination of Arguments and the Right to a Hearing: The Assessing Officer reviews the grounds of the objection. Within this framework, he possesses broad statutory authority to summon the taxpayer, demand additional documents, and even conduct a supplementary financial investigation.
-
Negotiations and Striving for an Agreement: This is a critical stage. The Assessing Officer maintains a degree of operational flexibility and is authorized to reach a mutually agreed settlement with you that significantly reduces the original tax liability demanded.
-
The Ultimate Recourse—Appeal to the District Court: If the Assessing Officer decides to reject your objection (issuing an “order under Section 152(b)”), the final avenue of recourse is filing a tax appeal to the District Court within 30 days.
The objection stage serves as the perfect window of opportunity to resolve the dispute internally under moderate pressure, without being dragged into prolonged, expensive, and exhausting litigation in the courts.
Frequently Asked Questions: What Business Owners Discover Too Late
-
Can I submit the objection myself or through my regular representative?
Technically yes, but practically it poses a critical risk. Your ongoing representative (the accountant or tax consultant) is excellent at managing current accounting affairs, but the objection stage is a distinct political-legal proceeding. Submitting an objection that is not tightly drafted within a legal framework closes many doors and can solidify errors that will harm you further down the road.
-
If I filed an objection, can the Assessing Officer worsen my situation and increase the tax amount?
The law permits the Assessing Officer to re-examine the file from scratch during Stage B; however, submitting a professional objection based on solid evidence typically creates a defensive line that prevents escalation and compels the authority to back down from its strict position.
-
Should I automatically agree to a compromise offered by the Income Tax department?
Under no circumstances should you do so without a clear strategy. Anyone who approaches objection hearings from a position of apology and weakness will find themselves paying exorbitant sums. A compromise is reached solely from a position of legal strength.
The Bottom Line: Legal Representation at the Assessment Stage Is Not a Luxury
The Tax Authority of 2026 speaks a unique language—a language of orders, sections, binding precedents, and confidential internal directives. Only an attorney who lives and breathes this system from the inside, who understands the tendencies of Assessing Officers and the balances of power, is capable of managing this struggle in a manner that protects your capital.
An expert tax attorney knows when to stiffen the line, when to de-escalate tensions, and precisely which legal leverage points to press to bring the Assessing Officer to sign an optimal settlement agreement for you. An assessment is merely the opening salvo; the objection is where the battle for your life’s work truly begins.
This article was authored by Attorney Yaniv Ish-Shalom, an expert in tax law and taxpayer representation in assessment and objection proceedings before the Israel Tax Authority at Ish-Shalom & Co. Law Firm.
For further information, official forms, and guidelines regarding the submission of objections, please visit the official website of the Israel Tax Authority.
